Archive for June 17th, 1999

Kev At Wizard World ALL 3 Days!

June 17th, 1999 @ 12:00 am | No Comments » | Scooped by Tim

  • Those of you who were wondering Kev’s appearance status at Wizard World ’99 will be happy to know: Stephen Shamus says that Kevin will indeed be there ALL THREE DAYS and will SPEAK and SIGN on each of those days, as well! Get those Oni Books & other VA swag ready, folks! Should be an excellent time.

Well, that about catches things up for us, at least for now! We may not check in with an update tomorrow, it’s my (Brad’s) 26th birthday (made it though another year!) so it may just be time for celebration or something. I’m sure we’ll be back soon enough with lots more, though. Catch ya next time, and as always, thanks for stopping by!

Kevin Lives…

June 17th, 1999 @ 12:00 am | No Comments » | Scooped by Brad & Chris

  • He’s back! After a very long hiatus from the web board (and an even LONGER trip to L.A., it seems), Kevin’s back with an update about the latest goings-on. Read on to hear the latest on the Clerks Animated Series (seems we were right on the money with that one), his feelings on the latest “Dogma” protests, and more. Sounds as if it’s getting a lot deeper in than even HE’D imagined. Here’s Kev:
Been awhile. I see it’s business as usual around here. Here’s what we’ve been up to for the last few weeks.

Stuck in LA, that’s what. The good news is that we’re three scripts and two records in on the animated series. The better news is it’s really, really funny. Kudos to Dave, Brian Kelley, Steve Luchner, Mosier and myself for three really hillarious episodes thus far. Kudos also to Chris Bailey, our director, who’s come up with a distinctive look for the show that seperates it from anything else out there. And huge kudos to Brian and Jeff (and Mewes) who’ve brought it all to life so well. I think it’s going to be a well-received show.

That’s pretty much what we’ve been solely doing for the last two weeks (there was also this thing on Mtv, I don’t know if anyone saw…).

From the papers this morning it would seem that the ‘Dogma’ protest isn’t going to die down anytime soon. I’m sorry, but anyone expecting a controversial film is in for a huge disappointment (though, as Breck pointed out somewhere below, I’d taken Buster’s word about that many moons back, and so far, he’s not proving very prophetic; what happened to you, Mike? Must I look for a new soothsayer?). I’m still shaking my head over the charges that I’m pissing on anyone’s beliefs, though. And I assure all concerned: the word ‘hump’ never pops up in ‘Dogma’.

To that point, the passage that was discussed below as well – about the quote from the earlier draft of the script – was not denying the Virgin birth; that is, in fact, one of the touchstones of the Catholic faith. But what the line DOES maintain is that AFTER – LONG after – the birth of Christ, Mary and Joseph had other children. This is not something I’ve made up or an idea I’ve trailblazed; many Christian faiths acknowledge the Biblical references to Jesus’ brothers and sisters as biological – not figurative. There are books out there on the subject, a recent one of which purports that one of the Apostles was a sibling of Christ (which Apostle it was, exactly, escapes me right now). Like any Catholic worth his salt, of course I believe Mary conceived Jesus without having known a man’s touch. However, I wasn’t aware – and I’m still not positive – that the Catholic Church objects to the idea that Christ had younger siblings; I just think it’s something they don’t necessarily include in their dogma.

If you ever get a chance, check out the talk-backs over at Aint It Cool News whenever ‘Dogma’ comes up. With the exception of the occasional Buster dig (two mentions in one post; gotta love a law book editor), I guess we’re pretty insulated from the venom (and I do mean venom) of the folks who don’t care for me or the flicks I’ve been involved with. As much as it depresses or frustrates me, I commit myself to reading the bile all the time – just to maintain perspective. And while I never usually comment on the bullshit that’s floated out there about me and mine, I would like to chuckle at the conspiracy-theorists who think we’ve trumped up this ‘Dogma’ outrage ourselves. Let me tell you something: no one – not me, not Scott, not even Harvey ‘I Love Press’ Weinstein himself – NO ONE needs the headache that comes with any of this bullshit. It’s no fun to regard strangers with caution, for fear that any one of them may be some of the letter-and-postcard writers who’ve deluged the Miramax offices with the hate propaganda I’ve been privy to. There are some frightening people out there that the crafty few with bigger fish to fry may not realize they’re inciting to violence. When all of this blows over one day, I’ll post a few of the particularly scary missives that make you think twice about leaving your home/office/bedroom. It’s one thing to protest the content of a movie; it’s another thing completely to warn someone to invest their money in a flak-jacket, because a group is organized, armed, and ready to do battle on behalf of God.

Which strikes me as the most bitter irony in this whole mess: I believe in God, they believe in God. Aren’t we on the same side (which, in light of the flak-jacket comment, doesn’t say too much for me)? But while it seems I’d like to spread God’s word (admittedly entertainingly; please recall – Christ Himself used this method as well: He imparted God’s word via parables, aka STORIES… albeit without the dick and fart jokes), they’d like to spread God’s wrath (and a few folks’ internals as well, from what the threats contained within the letters have said).

I guess it’s true what they say about good intentions and asphalt.

On a much better and more hopeful note, Jen’s started dilating (sp?). It’s now only a small matter of time before we bring an innocent into what’s lately seeming like a very ridiculous world.

Does anyone know if they make flak jackets for newborns?

Wow, it’s a good thing being webmasters gives us a degree of anonymity, or we’d be investing in some of those suckers, too! Some of our e-mails have been of the not-so-kind variety here and there lately…Aw well. We won’t stop.

DIVX Dies; Net Rejoices…

June 17th, 1999 @ 12:00 am | No Comments » | Scooped by Jim Garnett

  • While we realize it’s not directly Askew related, a subject that’s been permeating DVD websites over the past few years has been complaints about the inferiority of its competing format, DIVX. Yesterday, at the company’s website, www.divx.com, the product was officially announced as discontinued. We, along with the rest of the internet, it seems, rejoiced.

For the uninitiated, DIVX discs were a “pay per play” version of DVDs. They looked like a DVD, but that’s pretty much where the similarity ended. Many studios saw DIVX as a way to line their pockets, since customers would continually need to pay each time they wanted to watch the film (or even if they wanted to show a friend a specific scene, for example, yep, gotta pay the full price again), eliminating the middle man (the video rental store) and in effect bringing rental fees right to them. This was fine, to a degree, until certain studios (Fox and Disney being 2 big troublemakers) decided to release titles on DIVX ONLY and practically ignore DVD.

The trend WAS slowly shifting towards open DVD format for the past few months, with more big movies coming directly to DVD, where smart online shoppers at sites like reel.com and dvdexpress.com could get a new movie for about $14.99 with unlimited viewing. Not to mention, DVD offers superior picture quality due to widescreen 16:9 enhancement (not on ALL discs, but certainly becoming a trend), Dolby Digital 5.1 sound, commentary tracks, documentaries, trailers, and LOTS more. DIVX always offered the movie, normally in the fullscreen “pan & scan” format, and that was it.

Now that the product is defunct, in 2 years, DIVX players will no longer play the prodcut. Consumers who bought DIVX movies, even paid for unlimited locking (normally 15-20 bucks), may as well use their DIVX discs as frisbees. We knew this would happen, which is why we embraced DVD from the start.

Anyway, we think the moral of the story is this: Don’t assume the public is stupid. Even with major chain outlets like Circuit City singing the praises of DIVX over DVD, consumers were wise enough to see what a bum deal it was, and showed that by purchasing more DVD players and DVDs than DIVX. Who wants the complexity of having to hook their machine up to a phone line to call in whenever they want to watch a movie that’s on their shelf? Putting in a DVD and pushing PLAY is SO much easier, both on the brain AND the credit card.

In closing, with the death of DIVX upon us, studios will now need to embrace the DVD format more than ever in order to keep consumers happy and current. We predict many big announcements and good things to come in the next few months (including the releases of Clerks & Mallrats!).

Chasing Amy was released on the DIVX format, and MAY still be found if they’re holding any clearances on the suckers. We suggest picking one up for collector’s sake. We got ours a few months ago. Still in the shrink wrap.

Long live DVD!

Dogma Articles…

June 17th, 1999 @ 12:00 am | No Comments » | Scooped by Kevin Armont , Chasing Holden, Jason Gorber, Robby, Joshua Vichness, David Emprimo, Robert Newhart, Aug, Cruisin127, Zeebadaboodee, Risto Lehtonen & Jason Markstrom

  • Many more “Dogma” articles popped up seemingly overnight on us! Aaaah! Overload!!! Anyway, all the latest press, which has been majorly positive, is over at our Dogma: Rumor Control site. You can read them there or use the simple links below. At any rate, it seems like the controversy is now at an all-time high. We can only expect it to get worse as a new distributor and a release date are announced.

“CATHOLIC GROUP, MOVIEMAKERS CLASH OVER DOGMA” — Patrick Rizzo (Reuters)
(Positive, Spoilers)

“HOLY WAR HEATS UP OVER MIRAMAX MOVIE” — Rod Dreher (NY Post)
(Positive, Spoilers)

“DOGMA CONTROVERSY HEATS UP” — Cinescape.com
(Positive, Spoilers)